Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. Exchange National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1914No. 11749PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered March 22, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

On October 1, 1909, one Peter Edwall owned certain real property, situated in the city of Spokane, and on that day entered into a contract to sell the same to J. B. Ingersoll for the sum of $7,250. Ingersoll paid $1,250 on account of the purchase price of the property at the time of the execution of the contract, and on November 2, 1910, paid $3,000 more, together with the interest then accrued. The contract between the parties was in writing, and was placed in escrow with The Exchange National Bank of Spokane. Ingersoll subsequently assigned his interest in the contract to one Ona…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Northwest Bridge Co. v. Tacoma Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Buckingham v. FlummerfeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rinn v. Electric Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Baker v. SinclaireWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Plath v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Daugherty v. GuntherWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Gaastra v. Bishop's Lodge Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Western Hardware & Metal Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API