Gould v. McCormick
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Kauffman, J., entered November 24, 1911, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose a lien for architect’s services.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This is an action upon a contract. The plaintiffs are copartners, doing business under the firm name of Gould & Champney. The defendants are husband and wife. On August 4, 1909, the plaintiffs entered into a written contract with the defendant Robert McCormick wherein it was provided that the plaintiffs were to draw plans and specifications for a nine-story building which McCormick desired to construct upon lots one and two, block 28, Maynard’s addition to the city of Seattle. The contract, so far as material, was as follows:
“Second party [respondents] also agrees to take charge of and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Knight v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Hughes v. TorgersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- J. J. Henry Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Morsbach v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Pallardy v. Link's Landing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Waldemar P. Thomson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.