Legal Opinion

Maddox v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 2000No. 97-CF-1670 & 97-CF-1773PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Late one summer evening, appellants were crossing Duke Ellington Bridge in a car. They accosted two women walking along the bridge and robbed and pistol-whipped one of the women.

The principal issues on appeal have to do with the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence of “show-up” identifications and the contents of a clutch purse seized on a “plain view” theory. Both involve somewhat unusual factual features. First, the show-up identifications were made not only at the scene of the original detention of appellants a few minutes after the event, but also an hour…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Kaliku v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Bryant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API