United States v. A. Goldmark & Sons Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
Appellee imported lima beans from Madagascar which were assessed for duty under paragraph 763 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “dried beans” at 1% cents per pound. Said paragraph reads as follows:
Par. 763. Beans, not specially provided for, green or unripe, one-half of 1 cent per pound; dried 1% cents per pound; in brine, prepared or preserved in any manner, 2 cents per pound.
The importer protested the classification and claimed them dutiable at one-half of 1 cent per pound as “green or unripe” beans, under the same paragraph, or classifiable under paragraphs 760, 765, 767, 772, or 1657. It was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. Zanmati & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- United States v. Aki Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Seeman Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Boak v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Graphics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Lekas v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932