Legal Opinion

United States v. A. Goldmark & Sons Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1929No. 3093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellee imported lima beans from Madagascar which were assessed for duty under paragraph 763 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “dried beans” at 1% cents per pound. Said paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 763. Beans, not specially provided for, green or unripe, one-half of 1 cent per pound; dried 1% cents per pound; in brine, prepared or preserved in any manner, 2 cents per pound.

The importer protested the classification and claimed them dutiable at one-half of 1 cent per pound as “green or unripe” beans, under the same paragraph, or classifiable under paragraphs 760, 765, 767, 772, or 1657. It was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. Zanmati & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. United States v. Aki Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Seeman Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Boak v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Graphics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Lekas v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API