Legal Opinion

Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System v. Doak

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 22, 1934No. 13,446PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the' court.

Arthur Doak brought mandamus against Hertz Drive-Hr-Self System, Inc., of Colorado, a corporation, L. K. Brown and Jean F. Brown to compel the transfer to' plaintiff of 625 shares of the capital stock of the above corporation. Respondents prosecute error to review a judgment in favor of Doak, the petitioner, and apply for a supersedeas.

L. K. Brown was president and Jean F. Brown secretary of the company. Doak pleaded facts showing his-ownership of the stock, his possession of the certificates therefor, endorsed and assigned to him,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Prior v. NolandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. People Ex Rel. Lamme v. BucklandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Dennett v. Acme Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  5. Sturner v. James A. McCandless Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brownlow v. WunchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Hall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Mahon v. HarstColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Hern v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Beren v. Goodyear (In re Estate of Beren)Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API