Legal Opinion

Dennett v. Acme Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 26, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On exceptions by defendants. Petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Acme Manufacturing Company, a private corporation, and its president and treasurer in their official capacities, to issue to the petitioner a certificate for ten shares of the capital stock of the corporation, and to record the transfer of the same upon the books of the company.

Read the full summary

On exceptions by defendants. Petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Acme Manufacturing Company, a private corporation, and its president and treasurer in their official capacities, to issue to the petitioner a certificate for ten shares of the capital stock of the corporation, and to record the transfer of the same upon the books of the company. The bill of exceptions further states the case as follows: "The respondents filed a demurrer to the original petition asking that it be dismissed for the reason that the facts stated did not entitle the pétitioner to the relief demanded.…

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

Petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Acme Manufacturing Company, a private corporation, and its president and treasurer in their official capacities, to issue to the petitioner a certificate for ten shares of the capital stock of the corporation, and to record the transfer of the same upon the books of the company.

The petition sets forth, that on the 13th day of August, 1909, the Acme Manufacturing Company was . a corporation legally established and existing under the general corporation laws of the State of Maine; that the respondents, Drummond and Fogler, were then respectively the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schuyler Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. In re KlausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Murray v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. People ex rel. Adams v. Goss & Phillips Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Slemmons v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Consolidated Glass Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Steves v. RobieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  3. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System v. DoakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. Board of Trustees of Van Buren Hospital DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Savic v. KramlichIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API