Legal Opinion

Hern v. Looney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 26, 1998No. 16472-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The question here is whether a corporation’s transfer agent is required to transfer an apparently validly endorsed stock share in the face of a dispute over the legality of the transfer. We conclude that he/she is and affirm the court’s writ of mandamus but remand with directions to delete some unfounded findings in the order granting the writ.

FACTS

In 1975, Arlen B. Looney, Sr., Jack A. Hern, and August V. Klaue, stockholders in Regulus Stud Mills, Inc. (an Idaho corporation), agreed that upon each of their deaths the corporation would purchase the decedent’s shares. The agreement permitted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of GreenleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Chapman v. PereraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klaue v. HernIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Klaue v. HernIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API