Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. Ansted

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2012No. 2011-1517PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Marquise Jones, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellee, Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas Judge Barbara J. Ansted, to issue a new sentencing entry in Jones’s criminal case. Jones argues that the entry issued in his case is not a final, appealable order because it fails to dispose of every firearm specification of which he was found guilty. Thus, Jones contends, the entry does not comply with Crim.R. 32(C) and is not a final, appealable order.

{¶ 2} The October 29, 2008 sentencing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Tenace v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Lockhart v. WhitneyOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CappOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Culgan v. KimblerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Barker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API