Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lockhart v. Whitney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2011No. 2011-0822PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, John C. Lockhart Jr., for writs of mandamus and procedendo. Lock-hart seeks the writs to compel appellee, Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge W. Duncan Whitney, to issue a sentencing entry in Lockhart’s criminal case that complies with Crim.R. 32. Lockhart challenges the propriety of Judge Whitney’s December 2009 nunc pro tunc sentencing entry.

{¶ 2} Lockhart’s claims for extraordinary relief lack merit because the sentencing entry fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by including the findings of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kreps v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jones v. AnstedOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Lockhart v. Sheldon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. LockhartOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. DeWeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API