State ex rel. Lockhart v. Whitney
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, John C. Lockhart Jr., for writs of mandamus and procedendo. Lock-hart seeks the writs to compel appellee, Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge W. Duncan Whitney, to issue a sentencing entry in Lockhart’s criminal case that complies with Crim.R. 32. Lockhart challenges the propriety of Judge Whitney’s December 2009 nunc pro tunc sentencing entry.
{¶ 2} Lockhart’s claims for extraordinary relief lack merit because the sentencing entry fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by including the findings of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Kreps v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Jones v. AnstedOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Lockhart v. Sheldon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LockhartOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State ex rel. Walker v. DeWeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.