Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2011No. 2010-0235PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Introduction

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we must determine whether discharging a firearm into a habitation in violation of R.C. 2923.161 and a firearm specification pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(D) and 2941.145 are allied offenses of similar import as defined in R.C. 2941.25(A). We answer that question in the negative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Facts and Procedural Posture

{¶ 2} The state charged Aaron Ford in a three-count criminal complaint with improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation in violation of R.C. 2923.161(A)(1), inducing panic in violation of R.C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DraggoOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. VasquezOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API