Legal Opinion

State v. Lester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2011No. 2010-1007 and 2010-1372PublishedCited by 474 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} We are asked to determine this certified question: Is a nunc pro tunc judgment entry that is issued for the sole purpose of complying with Crim.R. 32(C) to correct a clerical omission in a prior final judgment entry a new final order from which a new appeal may be taken? We conclude that no new right of appeal is created by such an entry, and we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

I. Background

{¶ 2} In 2006, a jury found appellant, Steven Lester, guilty of various crimes. Appellant was sentenced to prison, and he was advised at the sentencing hearing that he would be subject to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. TripodoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. National Life Ins. Co. v. KohnOhio Supreme Court · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by474 opinions

  1. State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

469 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API