Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wrathall v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1935No. 5086Published

1ConcurrenceFolland, Justice

Because of the importance of the questions discussed by Mr. Justice MOFFAT in the prevailing opinion, I feel justified in adding my views to those already expressed by Mr. Justice ELIAS HANSEN, with whom I am in agreement. I, too, concur in the order made by Mr. Justice MOFFAT, but for the reasons and on the grounds stated by Mr. Justice ELIAS HANSEN. The issue disclosed in the prevailing opinion is whether underground percolating waters, including waters of artesian basins, are public waters and hence subject to the same regulation and control by the state under existing or future law, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API