Legal Opinion

Norton v. Herron

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1984No. 7197PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant Donald L. Norton, the owner of a house located in Fairbanks, Alaska, and appellee Carol Herron, a prospective buyer, entered into an agreement in May 1980 for the sale of Norton’s home. However, upon tender of the down payment by Herron in May 1981, Norton refused to perform, alleging that Herron was in default under the terms of the agreement. Shortly thereafter, Herron brought suit for specific performance. After denying the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the superior court granted Herron’s second motion for summary judgment ordering specific…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. DA Realty Holdings, LLC v. Tennessee Land Consultants, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API