Legal Opinion

Huber Manufacturing Co. v. Blessing

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1912No. 7,669PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Prom Howard Circuit Court; Lex J. Kirkpatrick, Judge. Action by The Huber Manufacturing Company of Marion, Ohio, against Samuel D. Blessing and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

— Appellant brought this action against appellees to enforce the payment of three promissory notes, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a traction engine, given to secure the payment of the notes.

The complaint was in three paragraphs, to which an answer in four paragraphs was filed. Reply in general denial. The issues thus joined were submitted to the court for trial, and at the request of the parties the court made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon in favor of defendants, and rendered judgment that plaintiff *91take nothing hy this action, and that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Albaugh Bros., Dover & Co. v. LynasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Memphis & Cincinnati Packet Co. v. PikeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Senco Products, Inc. v. RileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Decker v. MahoneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Gray v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Roach v. Cumberland BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API