Legal Opinion

Lanmark Technology, Inc. v. Canales

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 29, 2006No. 1:06CV327PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this diversity action for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation, plaintiff, Lanmark Technology, Inc. (“Lan-mark”), alleges that its former employee, defendant Arturo Canales, (i) breached a non-compete clause in his employment agreement and (ii) fraudulently induced Lanmark to hire him based on misrepresentations of his educational experience. Chiefly at issue on summary judgment is (a) whether Lanmark’s non-compete clause is fatally overbroad, and hence unenforceable under Virginia law and, if not (b) whether Canales violated the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Simmons v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Update, Inc. v. SamilowDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  2. Hawkins v. FishbeckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
  3. Brainware, Inc. v. MahanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  4. Lasership, Inc. v. WatsonFairfax County Circuit Court · 2009
  5. Job v. Simply Wireless, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API