Legal Opinion

Brainware, Inc. v. Mahan

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 24, 2011No. 1:11cv470 (LMB/TCB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No 11]. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Brainware, Inc. (“Brainware”) is a Virginia corporation that markets and sells “proprietary, enterprise software applications in a market known as Intelligent Data Capture or Intelligent Data Recognition.” Pl.’s First Am. Compl. [“Am. Compl.”] ¶¶ 7, 12. Defendant Michael Mahan (“Mahan”), who is a citizen of Texas, was employed by Brainware as a senior account…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Simmons v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Smith v. SydnorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. East West, LLC v. RahmanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  2. O'Sullivan Films, Inc. v. NeavesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018
  3. Capital One Financial Corp. v. KanasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  4. JTH Tax, Inc. v. SawhneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  5. Peraton Inc. v. Sam HussainDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API