Serpas v. Schmidt
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOCORAS, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs seek an order declaring Illinois’ Thoroughbred Rule 322 and Harness Racing Rule 25.19 unconstitutional under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, permanently enjoining defendants from engaging in certain acts under the authority of those Rules, and holding defendants liable for authorizing and conducting unlawful stops and searches. Defendants oppose plaintiffs’ motion and request summary judgment in their favor. For the reasons which follow, the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Don Serpas, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles E. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Don Serpas, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles E. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Hansen v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. StraussAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Don Serpas, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles E. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.