Legal Opinion
Don Serpas, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles E. Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 17, 1987No. 85-2393PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this suit, individually and on behalf of all exercise persons, grooms and hot walkers (collectively, “backstretehers”) at Illinois race tracks, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from certain investigative practices authorized by the Illinois Racing Board (the “Board”) and carried out by the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement (“IDLE”) on the ground that these practices violated the Fourth Amendment, as applied to the state of Illinois through the Fourteenth Amendment. The challenged practices included warrantless searches of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- V-1 Oil Company, a Wyoming Corporation v. State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality Steven P. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- People v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Dimeo v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.