Legal Opinion

People v. Strauss

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1986No. 85-1381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed by defendant, Richard Strauss. The State makes the following arguments: (1) the provisions of Thoroughbred Rule 322 and Harness Rule 25 — 19, which authorized warrantless searches of racetrack licensees, are constitutionally permissible under the administrative-search exception to the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) defendant’s fourth amendment rights were not violated when he, a jockey, has no reasonable expectation of privacy, given the highly regulated nature of the sport of horse…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Kole v. Village of NorridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Hansen v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API