People v. Strauss
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress filed by defendant, Richard Strauss. The State makes the following arguments: (1) the provisions of Thoroughbred Rule 322 and Harness Rule 25 — 19, which authorized warrantless searches of racetrack licensees, are constitutionally permissible under the administrative-search exception to the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) defendant’s fourth amendment rights were not violated when he, a jockey, has no reasonable expectation of privacy, given the highly regulated nature of the sport of horse…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kole v. Village of NorridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Hansen v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Steven Leroy v. Illinois Racing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994