Exigence, LLC v. Baylark
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceBrown, J.
I agree with all of the opinion except that I would strike the disrespectful language from Exigence’s briefs. Our rule is clear: “No argument, brief, or motion filed or made in the Court shall contain language showing disrespect for the circuit court.” Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1-5 (2010).
The following language essentially accuses the sitting judge of bias and clearly shows disrespect:
• These acts were an overt, transparent, and retaliatory abuse of discretion on the part of the Trial Court.
• In other words, the discovery at issue was irrelevant to this case, and the fact that Judge Simes entered a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henry v. EberhardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- McLemore v. ElliotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- White v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.