Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Exigence, LLC v. Baylark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 24, 2010No. 09-1272Published

1ConcurrenceBrown, J.

I agree with all of the opinion except that I would strike the disrespectful language from Exigence’s briefs. Our rule is clear: “No argument, brief, or motion filed or made in the Court shall contain language showing disrespect for the circuit court.” Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1-5 (2010).

The following language essentially accuses the sitting judge of bias and clearly shows disrespect:

• These acts were an overt, transparent, and retaliatory abuse of discretion on the part of the Trial Court.

• In other words, the discovery at issue was irrelevant to this case, and the fact that Judge Simes entered a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry v. EberhardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. McLemore v. ElliotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. White v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API