Legal Opinion
Aar International, Incorporated v. Nimelias Enterprises S.A., Vacances Heliades S.A. And Princess Airlines S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 27, 2001No. 00-2737PublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
AAR International, Inc. (“AAR”) appeals from the decision of the district court granting the appellees’ motion to abstain, stay and/or dismiss proceedings which AAR had brought against Vacances He-liades S.A. (“VH”). AAR also asks us to remand the case to the district court with instructions to deny VH’s alternative motion to dismiss the action on grounds of forum non conveniens. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
AAR leased a Boeing 737-3Q8 aircraft to VH for a term of 96 months pursuant to an Aircraft Lease Agreement in May of 1998. Shortly…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Hyatt International Corp. v. Gerardo CocoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Peter Weber v. Pact XPP Technologies, AGCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lindsay v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Faulkenberg v. CB Tax Franchise Systems, LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.