Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Yates

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2007No. 06-4430PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Douglas and Tina Lindsay brought suit against Defendants-Appellees JoAnn Yates, the Estate of Gene Yates, and Brent Yates (collectively, the “Yateses”), as well as Sluss Realty Company and realtor Carol Eicher, on the grounds that Defendants terminated a real-estate sales contract with the Lind-says one day after learning that the Lind-says are black. The district court dismissed the Lindsays’ complaint, concluding that they failed to plead facts establishing each element of a prima facie case as set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Boykin v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Inclusive Cmtys. Project, Inc. v. Lincoln Prop. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API