Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Lakewood
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2001No. 99-35453PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OVERVIEW
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Bryan Clark, the owner of three closed adult businesses in the City of Lakewood, brought this lawsuit challenging Lakewood’s new adult cabaret ordinance (“Ordinance”). Clark claims the Ordinance violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and the free speech provisions of the Washington Constitution and was passed in violation of the Washington Open Public Meetings Act (“OPMA”). Both Clark and the City of Lakewood moved for summary judgment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Lakewood concluding that Clark lacked standing…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Carrico v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Baur v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.