Legal Opinion
Kadillak v. Anaconda Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1979No. 14348PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Silver Bow County denying them relief on their complaint against the Anaconda Company and various state agencies relating to the establishment and operation of waste dump containing overburden and discard from open pit mining operations in the vicinity of their residences.
Early in the spring of 1974, residents of the Hillcrest subdivision in Butte, Montana, learned from newspaper articles that the Anaconda Company was contemplating mining activities in close proximity to their homes. They were naturally concerned about this prospect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn. of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Concerned About Trident v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Defense (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Ancient Order of Hibernians v. SparrowMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Swart v. CasneMontana Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coalition for Canyon Preservation v. Karl S. Bowers, Administrator, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- North Fork Preservation Ass'n v. Department of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Schoof v. NesbitMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Seven Up Pete Venture v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Benefis Healthcare v. GREAT FALLS CLINIC, LLP.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.