Legal Opinion
Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn. of Okla.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 4, 1976No. 75-510PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
Today we must decide whether the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to prepare an environmental impact statement before it may allow a disclosure statement filed with it by a private real estate developer pursuant to the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) to become effective.
I
The Disclosure Act, 82 Stat. 590, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1701 et seg., is designed to prevent false and deceptive practices in the sale of unimproved tracts of land by requiring developers to disclose information…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma v. LynnDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1974
3Cited by194 opinions
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.