People v. Kirby
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
In these cases we are asked to decide whether MCL 763.3; MSA 28.856 and MCR 6.401, 1 requiring the consent of the prosecution and approval by the court before a defendant may waive a criminal jury trial, are constitutional. While conceding that these rules are constitutional under federal constitutional analysis, see Singer v United States, 380 US 24; 85 S Ct 783; 13 L Ed 2d 630 (1965), defendants contend that these rules violate the Michigan Constitution because they preempt defendants’ exclusive constitutional right to select the factfinder in a criminal case. They further maintain that the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Underwood v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. CashMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Lawrence Delisle v. Jessie Rivers, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.