Legal Opinion

People v. Kirby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1992No. Docket Nos. 91803, 91959, (Calendar Nos. 2-3)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In these cases we are asked to decide whether MCL 763.3; MSA 28.856 and MCR 6.401, 1 requiring the consent of the prosecution and approval by the court before a defendant may waive a criminal jury trial, are constitutional. While conceding that these rules are constitutional under federal constitutional analysis, see Singer v United States, 380 US 24; 85 S Ct 783; 13 L Ed 2d 630 (1965), defendants contend that these rules violate the Michigan Constitution because they preempt defendants’ exclusive constitutional right to select the factfinder in a criminal case. They further maintain that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. People Ex Rel. Daley v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Underwood v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. People v. CashMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lawrence Delisle v. Jessie Rivers, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API