People v. Tanner
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
This Court granted leave to appeal to consider whether the rule announced in People v Bender, 452 Mich 594; 551 NW2d 71 (1996), should be maintained. Bender requires police officers to promptly inform a suspect facing custodial interrogation that an attorney is available when that attorney attempts to contact the suspect. If the officers fail to do so, any statements made by the suspect, including voluntary statements given by the suspect with full knowledge of his Miranda rights,1 are rendered inadmissible. Because there is nothing in this state’s Constitution to support that rule, we…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Maine v. Rayshaun MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.