Legal Opinion
Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil Corporation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 10, 1975No. Civ. 73-1059-YPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
This action was instituted by individuals and corporations acting as franchised gas station dealers for the BP Oil Corporation. The defendants are Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIÓ), an Ohio corporation which is a refiner and marketer of gasoline, and its wholly owned subsidiary, British Petroleum Oil Corporation (BP), a Delaware corporation engaged in the same business.
The plaintiffs have advanced five theories for relief. The first count alleges that the defendants BP and SOHIO violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 (1970), by conspiring…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Piedmont Label Company v. Sun Garden Packing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Bartholomew v. Virginia Chiropractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.