Legal Opinion

Cathryn Ann Linn v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 14, 2019No. 17-0007PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, an applicant for postconviction relief (PCR), Cathryn Ann Linn, claimed in the proceeding below that her trial counsel was ineffective for not adducing evidence of battered woman syndrome (BWS). To prove the claim, she sought a court-appointed BWS expert.

After Linn waited more than a year to learn whether the district court would appoint an expert, the State moved for summary disposition. The district court then denied Linn's request to appoint an expert and, in the same order, cited her failure to provide an expert in granting summary judgment for the State.

*721 Linn…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  3. Abdalla Elehamir Mousa v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
  4. Anthony Quinn v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022
  5. Arthur Lamar Benson v. State Public DefenderCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2022

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API