Legal Opinion
United States v. Berg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1998No. 97 Crim. 0866(LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
This ease presents the question whether the Court may restrain substitute assets subsequent to indictment but before conviction in a case charging that the defendants are liable to substantial forfeitures. 1
Fads
On March 5, 1998, a federal grand jury sitting in this District returned a 37-count superseding indictment charging Bruce Berg and others with conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5313(a) and 5324 as well as substantive violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 5313(a) and 5324 — in essence, that the defendant and others conspired to launder…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Assets of Tom J. Billman, United States of America v. Barbara A. McKinney Robert Budjac Roselyn BudjacCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Charles G. Floyd, Jr., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State ex rel. Riley County Police Department v. $1,489.00 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- United States v. Coleman Commercial Carrier, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002