State ex rel. Riley County Police Department v. $1,489.00 U.S. Currency
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beier, J.:
The State appeals the district court’s decision to return cash and a night vision device to a criminal defendant rather than forfeit them as substituted assets.
The defendant, Richard Lundquist, was convicted of multiple drug offenses. Both controlled substances and drug paraphernalia had been discovered in a search of his residence. The State filed a petition for forfeiture of a Cyclop-I night vision scope found in the bedroom and $1,489 in cash found with methamphetamine in Lundquist’s pockets.
The State proceeded under alternative theories at the forfeiture hearing: (1) The items…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BornfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard J. Lester, and Sheila Lester, Petitioner-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Moore v. Bird Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re NajawiczSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009