Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Fitzgerald

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This was an action by the appellee to recover damages for an alleged unlawful expulsion from the cars of the appellant by its servants.

The complaint contains three paragraphs. The first alleges that the appellant is the owner of a railroad extending from Indianapolis to Terre Haute, and engaged in the business of conveying persons for hire to and from those1 places, and intermediate places on the line of the road; that on a day named, the appellee paid the usual fare from Terre Haute to Greencastle, and took passage and occupied a seat in one of the cars of the appellant from the former to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Benedict v. . CowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. President of Springfield Bank v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  5. Reed v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Callaway v. MellettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Banister v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API