Banister v. Pennsylvania Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Colerick, C.
This action was instituted by the appellant against the appellee, to recover the value of a mule,, which, it was alleged, had been killed by the appellee. The-complaint» was in four paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the fourth paragraph, and an answer was filed to the others, in two paragi’aphs, the first of which was after-wards withdrawn. A demurrer was overruled to the second-paragraph of the answer, and, thereupon, a reply thereto was filed in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer was sustained, and, the appellant refusing to plead over, final judgment, on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Haute v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NewsomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. ClayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.