Legal Opinion
Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 24, 2003No. 02-1155PublishedCited by 274 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this case the trial court entered a final judgment on a jury verdict awarding damages to Micro Chemical, Inc. The defendants, Lextron, Inc. and Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc. (collectively, “the defendants”), appeal, challenging the district court’s understanding of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and of the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). Defendants specifically challenge the district court’s decision to admit the testimony of Micro Chemical’s damages…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by274 opinions
- Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.