Roth v. Travelers' Protective Assn. of America
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District, iu an appeal from Tarrant County. Roth sued the Travelers’ Protective Assn, and had judgment against it. On defendant’s appeal it was reversed and remanded, and appellee obtained writ of error on the ground that the "rulings ■ settled the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
The defendant in error, which is hereafter styled the association, is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Missouri and doing business in Texas. The object of forming the association was, among other things, “to provide a benefit fund for members of the association in case of accident or death.” The membership consisted of white males who possessed certain qualifications. The funds by which the benefits y^ere to be paid were collected in annual dues of $11, payable one-half in advance on January 1 of each year, and the other half on July 1. Article 9, section 2, of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goddard v. East Texas Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dallas Hotel Co. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. PutnamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.