Legal Opinion

West Coast Lumber Co. v. Knapp

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1898No. L. A. No. 453PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial in an action brought to foreclose liens of materialmen. Two points are made, based upon-the following allegations in the complaint: “That said contract does not provide that at least twenty-five per cent of the whole contract price shall he payable at least thirty-five days after the final completion of the contract, as by statute in such eases made and provided; that the drawings and specifications referred to in said contract were never identified by the signature of the *81parties to said contract as provided in said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mattison v. MarksMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Reed v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Donnelly v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coghlan v. QuartararoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Pratt v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Colorado Corp., Ltd. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Brill v. De TurkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API