Brill v. De Turk
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Lueien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This action was brought by the owner of the building on a building contractor’s bond. Plaintiff had judgment by default against the builders, who were the principals on said bond. Defendant De Turk, the surety, answered, and after a trial without a jury obtained a judgment, from which and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals. The bond sued on provided that the principals therein should faithfully keep and strictly perform all of the covenants of their contract, and well and truly pay, or cause to be paid, all just claims against them for the labor and materials…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Reed v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- San Diego Lumber Co. v. WooldredgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- New Liverpool Etc. Co. v. Western Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Merced Lumber Co. v. BruschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stimson v. Dunham, Carrigan, Hayden Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.