Legal Opinion

Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

The appellant seriously contends its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, interposed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence, should have been sustained.

Ordinarily an action against an owner or lessee of a building cannot be sustained where it is founded solely upon the fact that a patron or invitee was injured by slipping on a waxed or polished floor, where the floor had been waxed or polished in the Usual and customary manner and with material in general use for that purpose. Barnes v. Hotel Corp., 229 N.C. 730, 51 S.E. 2d 180, and the cases cited…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Mintz v. Town of MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Lee v. H. L. Green & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API