Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Independent Lamp & Wire Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the General Electric Company against the Independent I,amp & Wire Company.

1Opinion of the Court

HAIGHT, District Judge.

This suit is for an infringement of letters patent No. 1,082,933, granted to W. D. Coolidge December 30, 1913. The answer denies infringement. One of the issues, there*826fore, is whether the defendant does infringe. The plaintiff’s patent contains 34 claims, the first 23 of which cover a process and the last 11a product.

[1] The first interrogatory asks whether the defendant had manufactured, sold, or used “incandescent electric lamps having filaments of drawn tungsten wire.” It follows exactly the language of the twenty-fifth claim of the patent. The third interrogatory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watkins v. CopeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quirk v. QuirkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1919
  2. Paraffine Cos., Inc. v. WielandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1927
  3. Hartford v. Cleveland Automobile Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API