Legal Opinion
Page v. Myers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1946No. 11130PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The parties to this appeal are: the ap-pellee, Henry Clay Myers, owner of U. S. Patent No. 2,090,874, which is hereinafter referred to as the Myers patent, and the appellants, A. S. Page and Ellen H. Page, copartners doing business as Page & Page Co., manufacturers and sellers of certain logging trailers which the lower court found to be infringements of the Myers Letters Patent.
The claims of the patent are four:
“1. In a trailer the combination of a cross member adapted to be connected to a reach, a down-turned extending forked frame at each end of said cross member,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Paraffine Companies, Inc. v. McEverlast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Faulkner v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1948
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950