Legal Opinion
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Myers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1950No. 12253Published
1Opinion of the Court
181 F.2d 1008
FRUEHAUF TRAILER CO.
v.
MYERS.
No. 12253.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 24, 1950.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1950.
Arthur W. Dickey, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Michigan, Charles R. Spackman, Jr., Charles E. Wright, Pendergrass, Spackman & Bullivant, Portland, Oregon, for appellant.
Bardi G. Skulason, Ashley Greene, David Sandeberg, Portland, Oregon, for appellee.
Before BONE, Circuit Judge, GOODMAN and MATHES, District Judges.
2Per curiam 1
1
This is an appeal, pursuant to Title 28 U. S.C.A. § 1292(4), from a judgment again holding United States Letters Patent No. 2,090,874 to…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Kronberg v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1948
- Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1940
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Page v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946