Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Myers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1950No. 12253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal, pursuant to Title 28 U. S.C.A. § 1292(4), from a judgment again holding United Státes Letters Patent No. 2,090,874 to Myers, appellee here, valid and infringed. See Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp., D.C.Or. 1940, 36 F.Supp. 752; Page v. Myers, 9 Cir., 1946, 155 F.2d 57.

Appellant conceded at the bar upon oral argument that all claims of the patent in suit are valid, so only the issue as to infringement remains to be considered. On this issue the evidence clearly sustains the holding of the learned trial Judge. See Myers v. Fruehauf Trailer Co., D.C., 90 F.Supp. 265.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1948
  2. Myers v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1940
  3. Page v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
  2. Standard Coil Products Co., Inc. v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API