Legal Opinion

Blocton Cahaba Coal Co. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1929No. 2 Div. 942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

All other essential facts to a recovery not being questioned, the one and only issue for this court to decide is whether or not the deceased, when he received the injuries resulting in death, was acting within the line or scope of his employment. As stated in brief of counsel for the defendant, “Was the accident, whereby the deceased was killed, an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment?”

The intestate was employed to dig coal in a certain room and had caused an explosion to loosen the same, retiring before the explosion, but as soon as it was over returned to the room,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Walcofski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Alabama Concrete Pipe Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Jones v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Wallace v. Rex Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API