Legal Opinion

Childs v. Newfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1934No. Docket No. 8973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to compel the reconveyance of a parcel of real property in Los Angeles County based upon the alleged violation of certain building restrictions.

Plaintiffs on July 26, 1923, were the owners of a tract of land described as lot 73 of Montebello according to a map thereof duly recorded. On that date they executed and recorded a “Declaration of Establishment of Restrictions and Conditions”, which provided a general plan of improvement, and among other things that “Any residence erected upon any lot or subdivided portion of said tract shall be built so that the front…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Aller v. Berkeley Hall School FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Townsend v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API