Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of the Town of Sabattus v. Bilodeau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 11, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In Inhabitants of the Town of Sabattus v. Bilodeau, Me., 391 A.2d 357 (1978), we denied the Town’s appeal and dismissed Bilo-deau’s cross-appeal. Following the issuance of our mandate the parties became embroiled in a dispute over the allowance of costs on appeal. In response to our request, they have filed memoranda of law on the issue.

By the routine application of Rule 76(a), M.R.Civ.P., 1 each party would be enti- tied to costs. Rule 76(a) is restatement of 14 M.R.S.A. § 1501 (1964), Rand v. B. G. Pride Realty, Me., 360 A.2d 519, 522 (1976), which awards costs to the “prevailing party.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rand v. B. G. Pride RealtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Inhabitants of Town of Sabattus v. BilodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Michaud v. Inhabitants of Livermore FallsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. O'Brien v. DunlapSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Monopoly, Inc. v. AldrichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Tyson v. Whitaker & Son, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Thanks But No Tank v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API