Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Monopoly, Inc. appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) after a non-jury trial. Monopoly argues that testimony at the trial explicitly contradicts the written representations of facts on which the court (Cumberland County, Brodrick, J.) earlier granted a partial summary judgment and that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to correct the partial summary judgment. Charles Aldrich and Corlie Monaghan cross-appeal from (1) the denial of their motion for a summary judgment on the issue of whether Monopoly wrongfully…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Bigney v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Dodge v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Bank of Maine, N.A. v. WeisbergerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Bacon v. PenneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Saucier v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Daigle Commercial Group, Inc. v. St. LaurentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Tornesello v. TisdaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Department of Environmental Protection v. WoodmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.