Legal Opinion
Thanks But No Tank v. Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 24, 2013No. Docket Ken-12-574PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.
[¶ 1] Thanks But No Tank and several individuals (collectively, TBNT) appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Mills, J.) affirming the decision of the Department of Environmental Protection to grant DCP Midstream Partners, LP, a permit to construct a liquefied petroleum gas terminal in Searsport. See 5 M.R.S. § 11007(4)(A) (2012); M.R. Civ. P. 80C. After the Superi- or Court entered its judgment, DCP voluntarily surrendered the permit that is the subject of this appeal and filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot, which we granted on May 9, 2013. See 38…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Verso Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2015
- Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting v. Department of Inland Fisheries and WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Com. v. Williams, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Fairfax Board of Supervisors v. Ratcliff (ORDER)Supreme Court of Virginia · 2020