Legal Opinion

Young v. Teti

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 9, 2001No. 24911-1-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, A.C.J.

H. Victor Teti injured Patricia Young in an automobile accident; Teti was at fault. Teti’s insurance carrier paid $9,386 to Young. Young sued Teti for damages. The jury returned a verdict for Young, against which the trial court offset the $9,386 that Teti’s insurance carrier *723had already paid Young. Citing Mahler,1 the trial court reduced this offset by Young’s attorney fees and costs. Teti appeals this offset reduction, arguing that neither Mahler nor any other authority requires him to share Young’s costs in obtaining a verdict against him. Agreeing with Teti that Mahler does…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Winters v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Safeco Insurance v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Weismann v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Weismann v. Safeco Insurance Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API