Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 Matsyuk was injured while riding as a passenger in a car. She recovered from the at-fault driver’s insurance company, State Farm, under both the personal injury protection and liability coverages. Matsyuk then sought a pro rata share of her attorney fees from State Farm. Because Matsyuk’s recovery of both liability and personal injury protection payments came from the tortfeasor’s insurer, no common fund was created and fee sharing is not appropriate. The trial court properly granted State Farm’s CR 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her claims for attorney fees, breach of contract, conversion,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Weismann v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Weismann v. Safeco Insurance Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Wa State Dept Of Retirement Systems v. Kevin DolanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020