Legal Opinion

Weismann v. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 29, 2010No. 39323-9-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 Tortfeasor’s insurance company, Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, appeals a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of the injured party, Karen Weismann. In its summary judgment order, the trial court found that Safeco was required to reduce its personal injury protection (PIP) payment offset by a pro rata share of Weismann’s attorney fees and costs and that Weismann was entitled to additional attorney fees under Olympic Steamship Co. v. Centennial Insurance Co., 117 Wn.2d 37, 811 P.2d 673 (1991). Safeco asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API